This site runs best with JavaScript enabled.

How to optimize your context value

May 06, 2019

Why and how you can optimize your context provider's value to avoid performance issues

NOTE: I want to add that the times it's important to optimize your context value is when a certain combination of the following conditions are met:

  1. Your context value changes frequently
  2. Your context has many consumers
  3. You are bothering to use React.memo (because things are legit slow)
  4. You've actually measured things and you know it's slow and needs to be optimized

If that explains your situation, then read on (and don't miss the alternative solution which is honestly probably better anyway).

No seriously, if you're going to do this stuff just because you think your code might be slow, then don't bother. I'm not joking. React is really fast and adding complexity in the name of performance when performance is good enough is just wasteful of your "complexity budget"

When I explained how I create and use context for my React applications, I touched briefly on the importance of using React's useMemo hook. Here's that example again:

1// src/count-context.js
2import React from 'react'
4const CountContext = React.createContext()
6function CountProvider(props) {
7 const [count, setCount] = React.useState(0)
8 const value = React.useMemo(() => {
9 return {
10 count,
11 setCount,
12 }
13 }, [count])
14 return <CountContext.Provider value={value} {...props} />
17function useCount() {
18 const context = React.useContext(CountContext)
19 if (!context) {
20 throw new Error('useCount must be used within a CountProvider')
21 }
22 const {count, setCount} = context
23 const increment = React.useCallback(() => setCount(c => c + 1), [setCount])
24 return {
25 count,
26 increment,
27 }
30export {CountProvider, useCount}

I got a lot of questions about why useMemo is necessary here, so I'm going to demonstrate how not using useMemo can result in unnecessary re-renders for folks who want to use React.memo (which is like PureComponent and shouldComponentUpdate for function components).

Here's the final app that we're going to build to demonstrate this:

App Screenshot showing force render button, current count, and increment count button

The boxes each represent an individual component and the number in gray represents the render count of that component. Here's the codesandbox:

Here's the basic structure of the components:

2 <CountProvider>
3 <CountDisplay />
4 <Counter />
5 </CountProvider>

So when <App /> re-renders, it'll re-render all of the other components. Most of the time this isn't a problem, mostly because the <App /> shouldn't re-render very often. But you could imagine this being in any part of the tree of our application. Let's say that rendering <CountDisplay /> and <Counter /> is expensive for one reason or another, so we've put that in a React.memo.

With that setup, we can click the "force render" button which will trigger a re-render of the <App /> component, but because the props to the memoized <CountDisplay /> and <Counter /> components does not change, those don't re-render.

Great! We're all set to reveal this problem. You'll notice that things are only re-rendering when they should. Let's click on "force render" three times and "Increment count" twice:

clicking "force render" three times and "Increment count" twice

Notice that the <App /> has now been rendered 4 times and the others have only been rendered 3 times. This is exactly what we want. The count components get a re-render only when they need it, which is what we get from React.memo.

So now let's remove the useMemo from the context provider:

1function CountProvider(props) {
2 const [count, setCount] = React.useState(0)
3 const value = {count, setCount}
4 return <CountContext.Provider value={value} {...props} />

Now let's try to do the same thing again:

clicking "force render" three times and "Increment count" twice

Oh no! Everything is getting rendered when we click "force render" and the memoized components are getting re-rendered anyway. So why is that happening? It's happening because of the way that React context works.

From the React Context.Provider documentation:

All consumers that are descendants of a Provider will re-render whenever the Provider’s value prop changes. The propagation from Provider to its descendant consumers is not subject to the shouldComponentUpdate method, so the consumer is updated even when an ancestor component bails out of the update.

Changes are determined by comparing the new and old values using the same algorithm as

That last bit is the important part. is really similar to ===.

So const value = {count, setCount} in the CountProvider function is creating a brand new object every time it's called. So when React does it's check, newValue), it will always be false, meaning that every time CountProvider is re-rendered, every context consumer will be re-rendered as well, even if the actual relevant values are unchanged.

And by the way, we can't solve this by memoizing CountProvider with React.memo, because the children prop will change every render, so it wont be effective anyway.


Most of the time, this wont be a huge deal, especially if your context value doesn't change very often, but it's normally pretty easy to memoize the value with React.useMemo anyway so may as well do it all the time for your context value and avoid the problem.

Good luck!

An alternative

I should mention there's an alternative approach to this which does not require useMemo. It involves separating the state and the mechanism for updating that state into two separate contexts. Here's that:

Not only do you not need to useMemo in this case, but you actually can avoid re-rendering the components that just use the updater context:

clicking "force render" three times and "Increment count" twice

Notice that this is the same as with the useMemo solution, except because the <Counter /> component's context isn't getting updated, we avoid the re-render of that component entirely which is cool.

I personally feel like this is more complicated of an API than is necessary for most situations, so I'll stick with the useMemo solution for my own code. But if you really have a context with a lot of consumers and many only update the context value (not consume it as well), then consider splitting the state updater from the state value itself.

Discuss on TwitterEdit post on GitHub

Share article
loading relevant upcoming workshops...
Kent C. Dodds

Kent C. Dodds is a JavaScript software engineer and teacher. He's taught hundreds of thousands of people how to make the world a better place with quality software development tools and practices. He lives with his wife and four kids in Utah.